Volume 14, Issue 1 (6-2016)                   sjsph 2016, 14(1): 31-44 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tavakoli M R, Karimi S, Javadi M, Jabbari A. The Survey of Performance Supervision Board New System Hospitals Administration Alan in Selected Training Hospitals of Isfahan: A Qualitative Study. sjsph. 2016; 14 (1) :31-44
URL: http://sjsph.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5355-en.html

1- MSc. Student, Department of Health Services, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , moslem6868@yahoo.com
2- Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Health Services Management, Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Ph.D. Health Services Management, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Health Services, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (2803 Views)

Background and Aim:  In 1995 the new plan (system) of hospital administration plan/scheme (fee for service) was communicated. According to this plan a proportion (percentage) of the hospital income would be allocated to the hospital staff as a fee for service; the remaining would, after deducting other expenditures, be allocated for the autonomy of the hospital. Based on the plan/scheme, the Supervisory Board will consist of two main committees, namely, the High Supervisory Board and the Supervisory Board for the Centers (hospitals). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Supervisory Board in the new system of hospital administration plan in selected teaching hospitals of Esfahan, Iran in 2014.

Materials and Methods: This was a qualitative research. Eleven individuals were selected by targeted sampling and interviewed using semi-structured interviews. The thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data.

Result: Based on the thematic analysis results, the main source of weakness in the underlying and structural factors (developing programs and the implementation phase) was the Hospital Administration Supervisory Board in the new system.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the most notable findings in this study are weaknesses in the underlying and structural factors (developing the program) and weak underlying and structural factors (implementation of the program). The findings will help health policy-makers to develop suitable strategies and a plan of action to minimize weaknesses of the new fee for service scheme/plan.

Full-Text [PDF 420 kb]   (824 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Public Health
Received: 2016/07/4 | Accepted: 2016/07/4 | Published: 2016/07/4

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb