Volume 6, Number 3 and 4 (13 2009)                   sjsph 2009, 6(3 and 4): 111-117 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Golbabaee F, Esmaeilzadeh A, Rahimi A, Shahtaheri S. Evaluation of laboratory fume-hoods performance in a petrochemical industry based on ASHRAE 110 Standard. sjsph. 2009; 6 (3 and 4) :111-117
URL: http://sjsph.tums.ac.ir/article-1-137-en.html

Abstract:   (5727 Views)

Background and Aim: Laboratory fume-hoods are the first-level protection for the laboratory staff against hazardous chemical pollutants. Considering the large numbers of personnel, especially in petrochemical industry laboratories, this project was carried out in order to assess the performance of laboratory hoods based on tracer gas (SF6).

Materials and Methods: In this project 22 hoods in the laboratories of a petrochemical industry were studied. Operation of the hoods was assessed based on quantitative (with SF6 as tracer gas) and qualitative (face velocity measurement, using thermal anemometer) tests, according to ASHRAE 110 stndard.

Results: In comparison with the minimum acceptable face velocity (80 fpm), the mean values of face velocities of only 9.09% of the hoods passed the test (P=0.001) and were at an acceptable level. As regards the tracer gas test, the results were even worse: only 4.5% of the hoods passed the acceptability test (p=0.001). In addition, non of the hoods having an acceptable face velocity passed the tracer gas test. Similarly, no hood with an accepatable tracer gas performance had an acceptable face velocity.

Conclusion: Since there is no consistency between face velocity and tracer gas tests, performance of laboratory hoods can necessarily be assessed on the basis of the tracer gas quantitative test. The face velocity test is a supplementary test, which, if used alone wil give false results.

Full-Text [PDF 71 kb]   (1396 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2008/10/6 | Accepted: 2009/03/14 | Published: 2013/08/9

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb